Efficient Causation Within Concrescence

Process Studies 19 (3):167-180 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

03606503

DOI

10.5840/process199019332

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Lewis S. Ford. Lucas - 1998 - Process Studies 27 (1):7-17.
Lewis S. Ford and Traditional Interpretations of Whitehead’s Metaphysics.Denis Hurtubise - 2000 - Process Studies 29 (1):168-174.
Whatever Happened to ’Efficient Causation’?Lewis S. Ford - 2005 - Process Studies 34 (1):117-131.
Transmission, Inheritance, and Efficient Causation.Richard W. Field - 1984 - Process Studies 14 (1):44-46.
Forms of Concrescence. [REVIEW]Murry Code - 2000 - Process Studies 29 (1):175-177.
The Time of Whitehead’s Concrescence.John W. Lango - 2001 - Process Studies 30 (1):3-21.
The Status of Artistic Illusion in Concrescence.Wayne A. Dalton - 1974 - Process Studies 4 (3):207-211.
Croce and Whitehead on Concrescence.George Allan - 1972 - Process Studies 2 (2):95-111.
Celebrating Lewis S. Ford’s Thought in Process.Jorge L. Nobo - 1998 - Process Studies 27 (1):5-6.
Lewis S. Ford’s Theology.Robert C. Neville - 1998 - Process Studies 27 (1):18-33.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
39 (#580,153)

6 months
8 (#597,840)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The concept of transition and its role in Leibniz’s and Whitehead’s metaphysics of motion.Tamar Levanon - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (2):352-361.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references