The strong tree property at successors of singular cardinals

Journal of Symbolic Logic 79 (1):193-207 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/jsl.2013.3

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Strong and Super Tree Properties at Successors of Singular Cardinals.William Adkisson - 2024 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 89 (3):1251-1283.
The tree property at the two immediate successors of a singular cardinal.James Cummings, Yair Hayut, Menachem Magidor, Itay Neeman, Dima Sinapova & Spencer Unger - 2021 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 86 (2):600-608.
The tree property at double successors of singular cardinals of uncountable cofinality.Mohammad Golshani & Rahman Mohammadpour - 2018 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 169 (2):164-175.
The tree property at first and double successors of singular cardinals with an arbitrary gap.Alejandro Poveda - 2020 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 171 (5):102778.
The strong tree property and the failure of SCH.Jin Du - 2019 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 58 (7-8):867-875.
The tree property at double successors of singular cardinals of uncountable cofinality with infinite gaps.Mohammad Golshani & Alejandro Poveda - 2021 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 172 (1):102853.
Aronszajn trees and the successors of a singular cardinal.Spencer Unger - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (5-6):483-496.
The tree property at successors of singular cardinals.Menachem Magidor & Saharon Shelah - 1996 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 35 (5-6):385-404.
Aronszajn trees and failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis.Itay Neeman - 2009 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 9 (1):139-157.
Reviewed Work: Recent papers on the tree property. Aronszajn trees and failure of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis. Journal of Mathematical Logic, vol. 9, no. 1 , The tree property at ℵ ω+1. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 77, no. 1 , The tree property and the failure of SCH at uncountable confinality. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 51, no. 5-6 , The tree property and the failure of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis at [image]. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 77, no. 3 , Aronszajn trees and the successors of a singular cardinal. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 52, no. 5-6 , The tree property up to ℵ ω+1. Journal of Symbolic Logic. vol. 79, no. 2 by Itay Neeman; Dima Sinapova; Spencer Unger. [REVIEW]Review by: James Cummings - 2015 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 21 (2):188-192.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
26 (#849,392)

6 months
5 (#1,035,700)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Subcompact Cardinals, Type Omission, and Ladder Systems.Yair Hayut & Menachem Magidor - 2022 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 87 (3):1111-1129.
The strong tree property and the failure of SCH.Jin Du - 2019 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 58 (7-8):867-875.
Piece selection and cardinal arithmetic.Pierre Matet - 2022 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 68 (4):416-446.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The combinatorial essence of supercompactness.Christoph Weiß - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (11):1710-1717.

Add more references