Berkeley on abstraction

Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (4):483-501 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
73 (#287,407)

6 months
10 (#407,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Flage
James Madison University

Citations of this work

Why Leibniz Should Have Agreed with Berkeley about Abstract Ideas.Stephen Puryear - 2021 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 29 (6):1054-1071.
Hume on Abstraction and Identity.Donald L. M. Baxter - 2017 - In Stefano Di Bella & Tad M. Schmaltz (eds.), The Problem of Universals in Early Modern Philosophy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 285-304.
Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology.Daniel E. Flage - 2004 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (1):25-60.
The Role of Visual Language in Berkeley’s Account of Generality.Katherine Dunlop - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (3):525-559.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references