How True It Is = Who Says It’s True

Studia Logica 91 (3):335-366 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a largely expository paper in which the following simple idea is pursued. Take the truth value of a formula to be the set of agents that accept the formula as true. This means we work with an arbitrary Boolean algebra as the truth value space. When this is properly formalized, complete modal tableau systems exist, and there are natural versions of bisimulations that behave well from an algebraic point of view. There remain significant problems concerning the proper formalization, in this context, of natural language statements, particularly those involving negative knowledge and common knowledge. A case study is presented which brings these problems to the fore. None of the basic material presented here is new to this paper—all has appeared in several papers over many years, by the present author and by others. Much of the development in the literature is more general than here—we have confined things to the Boolean case for simplicity and clarity. Most proofs are omitted, but several of the examples are new. The main virtue of the present paper is its coherent presentation of a systematic point of view—identify the truth value of a formula with the set of those who say the formula is true.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Formal truth and objective truth.Anguel S. Stefanov - 1984 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 13 (3):154-160.
On an Algebra of Lattice-Valued Logic.Lars Hansen - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (1):282 - 318.
A note on the notion of truth in fuzzy logic.Petr Hájek & John Shepherdson - 2001 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 109 (1-2):65-69.
Another plan for negation.Nissim Francez - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Logic 16 (5):159-176.
The Modal Logic of Agreement and Noncontingency.Lloyd Humberstone - 2002 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 43 (2):95-127.
Commutative regular rings and Boolean-valued fields.Kay Smith - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (1):281-297.
IF Modal Logic and Classical Negation.Tero Tulenheimo - 2014 - Studia Logica 102 (1):41-66.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-04-04

Downloads
66 (#316,160)

6 months
13 (#242,872)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Melvin Fitting
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Bilattices are nice things.Melvin Fitting - 2008 - In Thomas Bolander (ed.), Self-reference. Center for the Study of Language and Inf.
A useful four-valued logic.N. D. Belnap - 1977 - In J. M. Dunn & G. Epstein (eds.), Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic. D. Reidel.
Tableaus for many-valued modal logic.Melvin Fitting - 1995 - Studia Logica 55 (1):63 - 87.

View all 10 references / Add more references