Why Potentiality Does Not Matter: A Reply to Stone

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 24 (2):261 - 279 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,248

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why Potentiality Still Matters.Jim Stone - 1994 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 24 (2):281 - 293.
Reply to Tenenbaum.Joshua Gert - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (3):463-476.
Reply to Bennett.John Campbell - 1982 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (4):757 - 761.
Reply to Scheffler.Stephen L. Darwall - 1982 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):263 - 264.
Aristotelian matter, potentiality and quarks.Eugene Schlossberger - 1979 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 17 (4):507-521.
Reply to Beehler.Joshua Cohen & Joel Rogers - 1989 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19 (4):583 - 587.
Reply to Earman.Barbara Lariviere - 1989 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):89 - 90.
Reply to Darwall.Samuel Scheffler - 1982 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):257 - 262.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
72 (#296,735)

6 months
12 (#310,597)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Identity and Essence.Baruch A. Brody - 1980 - Princeton University Press.
Why Potentiality Matters.Jim Stone - 1987 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (4):815-829.

Add more references