Fair Innings? Against Healthcare Rationing in Favour of the Young over the Elderly

Studies in Christian Ethics 26 (4):431-450 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article provides a critical appraisal of the case for healthcare being rationed away from older patients to those who are younger. After sketching a metaphysics of elderliness and reviewing clinical and economic cases for healthcare rationing, the article looks in depth at the most challenging case for age rationing known as the ‘fair innings’ case. This article rejects that case and makes an alternative case that fairness actually dictates against age rationing in favour of allocation on the basis of need. It concludes with a call for a renewed ‘covenant between generations’, founded on the virtue of pietas

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,902

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fair Innings and Time-Relative Claims.Ben Davies - 2015 - Bioethics 30 (6):462-468.
Rationing, Justice, and Ageism.John Keown - 2002 - In K. W. M. Fulford, Donna Dickenson & Thomas H. Murray (eds.), Healthcare Ethics and Human Values: An Introductory Text with Readings and Case Studies. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 292.
Just Caring: In Defense of Limited Age-Based Healthcare Rationing.Leonard M. Fleck - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (1):27.
Rationing and resource allocation in healthcare: essential readings.Ezekiel J. Emanuel (ed.) - 2018 - New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
107 (#197,669)

6 months
5 (#1,025,536)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references