Extensions and Limits of the Specker–Blatter Theorem

Journal of Symbolic Logic 89 (3):1284-1312 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The original Specker–Blatter theorem (1983) was formulated for classes of structures $\mathcal {C}$ of one or several binary relations definable in Monadic Second Order Logic MSOL. It states that the number of such structures on the set $[n]$ is modularly C-finite (MC-finite). In previous work we extended this to structures definable in CMSOL, MSOL extended with modular counting quantifiers. The first author also showed that the Specker–Blatter theorem does not hold for one quaternary relation (2003).If the vocabulary allows a constant symbol c, there are n possible interpretations on $[n]$ for c. We say that a constant c is hard-wired if c is always interpreted by the same element $j \in [n]$. In this paper we show: (i)The Specker–Blatter theorem also holds for CMSOL when hard-wired constants are allowed. The proof method of Specker and Blatter does not work in this case.(ii)The Specker–Blatter theorem does not hold already for $\mathcal {C}$ with one ternary relation definable in First Order Logic FOL. This was left open since 1983.Using hard-wired constants allows us to show MC-finiteness of counting functions of various restricted partition functions which were not known to be MC-finite till now. Among them we have the restricted Bell numbers $B_{r,A}$, restricted Stirling numbers of the second kind $S_{r,A}$ or restricted Lah-numbers $L_{r,A}$. Here r is a non-negative integer and A is an ultimately periodic set of non-negative integers.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Arity and alternation in second-order logic.J. A. Makowsky & Y. B. Pnueli - 1994 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 78 (1-3):189-202.
Forbidden Induced Subgraphs and the Łoś–Tarski Theorem.Yijia Chen & Jörg Flum - 2024 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 89 (2):516-548.
Algorithmic uses of the Feferman–Vaught Theorem.J. A. Makowsky - 2004 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 126 (1-3):159-213.
Contextualism and Nonlocality in Quantum Mechanics.Michael William Kernaghan - 1995 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
Conway–Kochen and the Finite Precision Loophole.Ronnie Hermens - 2014 - Foundations of Physics 44 (10):1038-1048.
Pseudofinite Structures and Counting Dimensions.Tingxiang Zou - 2021 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 27 (2):223-223.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-11-18

Downloads
4 (#1,805,339)

6 months
4 (#1,258,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Algorithmic uses of the Feferman–Vaught Theorem.J. A. Makowsky - 2004 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 126 (1-3):159-213.
Finite Model Theory.Heinz-Dieter Ebbinghaus & Torg Flum - 1997 - Studia Logica 58 (2):332-335.

Add more references