Refining Russell’: Response to Leon Horsten’s and Ryo Ito’s ‘Russell and Fine on Variable Objects

In Federico L. G. Faroldi & Frederik Van De Putte (eds.), Kit Fine on Truthmakers, Relevance, and Non-classical Logic. Springer Verlag. pp. 705-713 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I consider, in the light of Horsten’s and Ito’s paper, how the theory of arbitrary objects might help to make sense of Russell’s views on the nature of variables.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/978-3-031-29415-0_30

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Russell and Fine on Variable Objects.Leon Horsten & Ryo Ito - 2023 - In Federico L. G. Faroldi & Frederik Van De Putte (eds.), Kit Fine on Truthmakers, Relevance, and Non-classical Logic. Springer Verlag. pp. 691-704.
An Epistemized Truthmaker Semantics for Epistemic Logic’: Response to Hawke’s and Özgün’s ‘Truthmaker Semantics for Epistemic Logic.Kit Fine - 2023 - In Federico L. G. Faroldi & Frederik Van De Putte (eds.), Kit Fine on Truthmakers, Relevance, and Non-classical Logic. Springer Verlag. pp. 337-348.
Kit Fine’s Autobiography.Kit Fine - 2023 - In Federico L. G. Faroldi & Frederik Van De Putte (eds.), Kit Fine on Truthmakers, Relevance, and Non-classical Logic. Springer Verlag. pp. 13-21.
The Postulation of Possibilities’: Response to Peter Fritz’s ‘Propositional Potentialism.Kit Fine - 2023 - In Federico L. G. Faroldi & Frederik Van De Putte (eds.), Kit Fine on Truthmakers, Relevance, and Non-classical Logic. Springer Verlag. pp. 503-519.
The Whole Truth: An Internal Perspective’: Response to Krämer’s ‘The Whole Truth.Kit Fine - 2023 - In Federico L. G. Faroldi & Frederik Van De Putte (eds.), Kit Fine on Truthmakers, Relevance, and Non-classical Logic. Springer Verlag. pp. 551-572.
Introduction: Kit Fine on Truthmakers, Relevance, and Non-classical Logic.Federico L. G. Faroldi & Frederik Van De Putte - 2023 - In Federico L. G. Faroldi & Frederik Van De Putte (eds.), Kit Fine on Truthmakers, Relevance, and Non-classical Logic. Springer Verlag. pp. 1-12.
To Be or Not to Be Disjunctive’: Response to Mark Jago’s ‘Conjunctive and Disjunctive Parts.Kit Fine - 2023 - In Federico L. G. Faroldi & Frederik Van De Putte (eds.), Kit Fine on Truthmakers, Relevance, and Non-classical Logic. Springer Verlag. pp. 189-206.
In Defense of a Global View of Vagueness’: Response to Andreas Ditter’s ‘Fine on the Possibility of Vagueness.Kit Fine - 2023 - In Federico L. G. Faroldi & Frederik Van De Putte (eds.), Kit Fine on Truthmakers, Relevance, and Non-classical Logic. Springer Verlag. pp. 735-747.
‘Truthmaker Semantics for Relevance Logic’: Response to ‘Fine’s Semantics for Relevance Logic and its Relevance’ by Katalin Bimbó and J. Michael Dunn.Kit Fine - 2023 - In Federico L. G. Faroldi & Frederik Van De Putte (eds.), Kit Fine on Truthmakers, Relevance, and Non-classical Logic. Springer Verlag. pp. 151-165.
The Ghost of Impossibility’: Response to Peter Verdée’s ‘Truthmakers and Relevance for FDE, LP, K3 and CL.Kit Fine - 2023 - In Federico L. G. Faroldi & Frederik Van De Putte (eds.), Kit Fine on Truthmakers, Relevance, and Non-classical Logic. Springer Verlag. pp. 281-294.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-27

Downloads
12 (#1,368,341)

6 months
3 (#1,470,822)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kit Fine
New York University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references