Dispositioning and the Obscured Roles of Time in Psychological Explanations

Behavior and Philosophy 36:5 - 69 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

"Now" is privileged in most psychological theories, which portray their processes as proceeding from moment-to-moment. As in any science, this adherence to contiguous causation hinders an account of phenomena that involve remote events or temporally extended organization. In addition, our scientific discourse is framed by the everyday patterns we have learned in explaining our own actions and those of others, yielding a bipolar constraint of explanatory language. Thus, tripolar relations among organism, environment and behavior are reduced to cause–effect, noun–verb, agent–action. This imposes exclusionary emphases upon organism-based or upon environment-based terms as accounting for behavior. Especially with remote causation or temporal dispersion, implicitly assumed contiguous causation appears to be defended through a practice we have called "dispositioning."

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-17

Downloads
21 (#1,017,991)

6 months
8 (#622,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

How Shall We Account for Variance?David C. Palmer - 2009 - Behavior and Philosophy 37:151 - 155.
Pragmatics and Pluralism in Explaining Human Action.Kenneth J. Gergen - 2009 - Behavior and Philosophy 37:127 - 133.
Behavior Streams" Versus "Behavior Extended in Time.Charles P. Shimp - 2009 - Behavior and Philosophy 37:157 - 163.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references