'There can be only one.' A Response to Joseph C. Schmid

Religious Studies 59:836-851 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently, in response to an article of mine, Joseph C. Schmid has argued that some traditional theistic arguments for God’s unicity are problematic in that they presuppose a controversial principle and conflict with Trinitarian theology. In this article, I answer Schmid’s concerns. I defend one of the original arguments while advancing new ones, and I vindicate my abductive argument for theism over naturalism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The aloneness argument: an aspectival response.Joshua R. Sijuwade - 2021 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion (3):1-27.
A threefold response to the evidential argument from evil.Han Jen Chang - 2023 - Dissertation, University of Birmingham
Two ‘Proofs’ of God's Existence: A. C. EWING.A. C. Ewing - 1965 - Religious Studies 1 (1):29-45.
The fruitful death of modal collapse arguments.Joseph C. Schmid - 2021 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 91 (1):3-22.
Skeptical Theism Proved.Perry Hendricks - 2020 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 6 (2):264-274.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-08-19

Downloads
33 (#688,357)

6 months
33 (#114,499)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Enric F. Gel
Universitat de Barcelona (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references