What Was Politics to the Denisovan?

Political Theory 42 (2):167-187 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What does it mean that humans were not the only hominin? Or, more importantly, what does it mean that other hominins held cultural, biological, and perhaps even linguistic equivalence to human beings? Drawing on mitochondrial DNA analyses, theories of deep history, and attention to the inhuman, this essay argues that such equivalence entails not only the reality of human/nonhuman genetic compatibility but the existence of politics in places and times without humans. Such a politics of non-humans would entail political and social forms playing a central role in the development of humanity. If politico-social experiences in the prehuman and non-human hominin communities actually affected behavior and practices, then the development of humanity is an effect of politics rather than a precondition for it.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,607

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The public thing.Mark Coeckelbergh - 2009 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 13 (3):175-181.
Politics as a Vocation, According to Aristotle.Donald Morrison - 2001 - History of Political Thought 22 (2):221-241.
Adorno, politics, and the aesthetic animal.Caleb J. Basnett - 2021 - London: University of Toronto Press.
Human nature and political conventions.Christopher J. Berry - 1999 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2 (2):95-111.
Gendering animals.Letitia Meynell & Andrew Lopez - 2021 - Synthese 199 (1-2):4287-4311.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
28 (#789,065)

6 months
7 (#673,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references