Motivational influences on word recognition: IV. Cortical magnification does not explain parafoveal versus foveal differences

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31 (6):602-604 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Motivational influences on word recognition: II. Affective coding.Eva Dreikurs Ferguson - 1989 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27 (4):307-310.
Emotional influences on word recognition.Richard J. Gerrig & Gordon H. Bower - 1982 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 19 (4):197-200.
Subsequent context influences auditory word recognition.Cm Connine, Dm Blasko & M. Hall - 1989 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27 (6):521-521.
Repetition does not improve word-recognition thresholds.Jw Whitlow & A. Cebollero - 1986 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (5):338-339.
Impact of word shape on word recognition.P. A. Allen & B. Wallace - 1991 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (6):526-526.
Eye movements and identifying words in parafoveal vision.Keith Rayner & Robert E. Morrison - 1981 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 17 (3):135-138.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
43 (#522,599)

6 months
13 (#267,677)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?