Radical empiricism is not constructive

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):563-564 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The radical empiricist theory of the Quartz & Sejnowski target article would result in a brain that could not act. The attempt to bolster this position with computational arguments is misleading and often just wrong. Fortunately, other efforts are making progress in linking neural and cognitive development

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neural constructivism: How mammals make modules.Robert A. Barton - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):556-557.
Neural construction: Two and a half cheers for Quartz & sejnowski!Dale Purves - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):573-573.
The nontrivial doctrine of cognitive neuroscience.Valerie Gray Hardcastle - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):839-839.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#529,991)

6 months
13 (#197,488)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references