The Rights of Animals and Unborn Generations

In William T. Blackstone (ed.), Philosophy & Environmental Crisis. pp. 43-68 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My main concern will be to show that it makes sense to speak of the rights of unborn generations against us, and that given the moral judgment that we ought to conserve our environmental inheritance for them, and its grounds, we might well say that future generations /do/ have rights correlative to our present duties toward them. Protecting our environment now is also a matter of elementary prudence, and insofar as we do it for the next generation already here in the persons of our children, it is a matter of love. But from the perspective of our remote descendants it is basically a matter of justice, of respect for their rights. My main concern here will be to examine the concept of a right to better understand how that can be.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-09-26

Downloads
159 (#145,368)

6 months
159 (#25,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Sentientism, Motivation, and Philosophical Vulcans.Luke Roelofs - 2023 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 104 (2):301-323.
Human rights without human supremacism.Will Kymlicka - 2018 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (6):763-792.
Environmental ethics.Andrew Brennan - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Luck and interests.Nathan Ballantyne - 2012 - Synthese 185 (3):319-334.
Accounting for the Harm of Death.Duncan Purves - 2014 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (1):89-112.

View all 43 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references