Assumptions of Grand Logics

Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A system of philosophy of the sort presented in this and the following volumes begins with logic. Philosophy properly speaking is characterized by the kind oflogic it employs, for what it employs it assumes, however silently; and what it assumes it presupposes. The logic stands behind the ontology and is, so to speak, metaphysically prior. One word of caution. The philosophical aspects of logic have lagged behind the mathematical aspects in point of view of interest and develop ment. The work of N. Rescher and others have gone a long way to correct this. However, their work on philosophical logic has been more concerned with the logical than with the philosophical aspects. I have in mind another approach, one that would call attention to the ontological (systematic meta physics) or metaphysical (critical ontology) aspects, whichever term you prefer. It is this approach which I have pursued in the following chapters. Since together they stand at the head of a system of philosophy which has been developed in some seventeen books, a system which ranges over all of the topics of philosophy, the chosen approach can be seen as the necessary one. But I have not written any logic, I have merely indicated the sort of logic that has to be written.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,733

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Assumptions of Grand Logics. [REVIEW]M. M. R. - 1982 - Review of Metaphysics 35 (3):601-602.
Assumptions of Grand Logics. [REVIEW]Stanley C. Feldman - 1980 - Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):141-145.
Topics in philosophical logic.Nicholas Rescher - 1969 - Dordrecht,: D. Reidel.
R. M. Martin’s Logic of Belief.David Parsons - 2017 - History and Philosophy of Logic 38 (1):72-86.
The Hermeneutic Priority of Which Question?Nathan Dickman - 2021 - Informal Logic 42 (4):485-508.
Logic and probability in physics.C. G. Darwin - 1939 - Philosophy of Science 6 (1):48-64.
Goedel's Ontological Argument.Randolph Rubens Goldman - 2000 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-14

Downloads
12 (#1,360,486)

6 months
3 (#1,467,943)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references