What I Said and What I Should Have Said

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 17 (1):163-178 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this reply I address problems identified by my critics in my concept of formal bias, my use of phenomenology, the relation between my work and McLuhan’s media theory, and the relation of science to technology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Response to My Critics.Don Ihde - 2003 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 7 (2):131-136.
Reply to My Interlocutors.Don Ihde - 2016 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 20 (2):168-176.
On Heidegger’s Actuality.Marc Van den Bossche - 2017 - Foundations of Science 22 (2):265-267.
Response to My Readers.Albert Borgmann - 2002 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 6 (1):76-85.
Science, Technology, and the Political.Gert Goeminne - 2013 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 17 (1):93-123.
Almost a Critical Theorist... in advance.Don Ihde - 2020 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 24 (1-2):15-26.
Formal Bias and Normative Critique of Technology Design.Graeme Kirkpatrick - 2013 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 17 (1):25-46.
Negative Philosophy: Time, Death and Nothingness.Françoise Dastur - 2020 - Research in Phenomenology 50 (3):317-332.
The Medical Drug as a Technological Object.Jonathan Simon - 2019 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 23 (1):51-67.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-04

Downloads
80 (#263,683)

6 months
8 (#610,780)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Feenberg
Simon Fraser University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references