Professional recommendations: disclosing facts and values

Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (1):20-24 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is not unusual for patients and their families, when confronted with difficult medical choices, to ask their physicians for advice. This paper outlines the shades of meaning of two questions frequently put to physicians: “What should I do?” and “What would you do?” It is argued that these are not questions about objective matters of fact. Hence, any response to such questions requires an understanding, appreciation, and disclosure of the personal context and values that inform the recommendation. A framework for considering and articulating a response to these questions is suggested, using as a heuristic the phrasing “If I were you…/If it were me…” Journal of Medical Ethics

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The loyal physician: Roycean ethics and the practice of medicine.Griffin Trotter - 1997 - Nashville, Tenn.: Vanderbilt University Press.
Medical expertise, existential suffering and ending life.Jukka Varelius - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (2):104-107.
The paediatrician and the rabbi.A. Shuper - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (6):441-443.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
47 (#472,652)

6 months
25 (#127,232)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Françoise Baylis
Dalhousie University

References found in this work

The Ideal of Shared Decision Making Between Physicians and Patients.Dan W. Brock - 1991 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1 (1):28-47.
What Can She Know?: Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge.Helen E. Longino - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (2):495-496.

Add more references