Attention Is Amplification, Not Selection

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (1):299-324 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue that recent empirical findings and theoretical models shed new light on the nature of attention. According to the resulting amplification view, attentional phenomena can be unified at the neural level as the consequence of the amplification of certain input signals of attention-independent perceptual computations. This way of identifying the core realizer of attention evades standard criticisms often raised against sub-personal accounts of attention. Moreover, this approach also reframes our thinking about the function of attention by shifting the focus from the function of selection to the function of amplification.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Memory and Attention.Brice A. Kuhl & Marvin Chun - 2014 - In Anna C. Nobre & Sabine Kastner (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Attention. Oxford University Press.
Bayesian Models of Attention.Angela J. Yu - 2014 - In Anna C. Nobre & Sabine Kastner (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Attention. Oxford University Press.
Attention as Selection for Action Defended.Wayne Wu - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
The phenomenology of embodied attention.Diego D’Angelo - 2020 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 19 (5):961-978.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-01

Downloads
762 (#32,309)

6 months
180 (#19,882)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Peter Fazekas
University of Antwerp
Bence Nanay
University of Antwerp

Citations of this work

Attention as Selection for Action Defended.Wayne Wu - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Attention and encapsulation.Jake Quilty-Dunn - 2020 - Mind and Language 35 (3):335-349.
Fuzziness in the Mind: Can Perception be Unconscious?Henry Taylor - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101 (2):383-398.
Attenuating oneself.Jakub Limanowski & Karl Friston - 2020 - Philosophy and the Mind Sciences 1 (I):1-16.
Vividness and content.Peter Fazekas - 2024 - Mind and Language 39 (1):61-79.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Reference and Consciousness.John Campbell - 2002 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Thinking about mechanisms.Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden & Carl F. Craver - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (1):1-25.
The representational character of experience.David Chalmers - 2004 - In Brian Leiter (ed.), The future for philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 153--181.
Explaining the Brain.Carl F. Craver - 2007 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

View all 32 references / Add more references