Reply to Professor Kent: [Again Lucilius on EI and I]

American Journal of Philology 34 (4):497 (1913)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/289388

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Again Lucilius on EI and I.Roland G. Kent - 1913 - American Journal of Philology 34 (3):315.
Lucilius on EI and I.Roland G. Kent - 1911 - American Journal of Philology 32 (3):272.
Lucilius on i and ei.Edwin W. Fay - 1912 - American Journal of Philology 33 (3):311.
Hindiisms in Sanskrit Again: A Reply to Professor Fay.Franklin Edgerton - 1920 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 40:84-89.
Professor Lodge's Reply.Gonzalez Lodge - 1929 - American Journal of Philology 50 (3):316.
The Reduction of ei to i in Homer.Herbert Weir Smyth - 1885 - American Journal of Philology 6 (4):419.
Comment on Professor Bennett's Reply.G. L. Hendrickson - 1899 - American Journal of Philology 20 (4):429.
Lucilius and Horace.Arthur L. Wheeler & George Converse Fiske - 1922 - American Journal of Philology 43 (1):83.
Lucilius and Archilochus: Fragment 698 (Marx).David Mankin - 1987 - American Journal of Philology 108 (2).
Lucilius 1165-6.J. R. C. Martyn - 1964 - American Journal of Philology 85 (1):66.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-11

Downloads
2 (#1,898,268)

6 months
2 (#1,696,787)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references