Replies to Li and Fan

In Hon-Lam Li & Michael Campbell (eds.), Public Reason and Bioethics: Three Perspectives. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 181-194 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Farrell and Tham argue against Li’s view expressed in Chap. 1. They also respond to Fan’s Confucianism articulated in Chap. 2.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Replies to Farrell & Tham, and to Fan.Hon-Lam Li - 2021 - In Hon-Lam Li & Michael Campbell (eds.), Public Reason and Bioethics: Three Perspectives. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 135-180.
Replies to Li and Farrell–Tham.Ruiping Fan - 2021 - In Hon-Lam Li & Michael Campbell (eds.), Public Reason and Bioethics: Three Perspectives. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 195-203.
Confucianism and Public Political Discussion.Franz Mang - 2023 - Comparative Political Theory 3 (2):154-168.
That Anselm’s God Exists and Gaunilo’s Island Does Not.Richard Campbell - 2019 - In Peter Wong, Sherah Bloor, Patrick Hutchings & Purushottama Bilimoria (eds.), Considering Religions, Rights and Bioethics: For Max Charlesworth. Springer Verlag. pp. 115-137.
Replies To Farrell And Compton.Nick Zangwill - 2008 - American Society for Aesthetics Graduate E-Journal 1 (1):14-20.
A Note on Gödel-Dummet Logic LC.Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez - 2021 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 50 (3):325-335.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-09

Downloads
8 (#1,591,922)

6 months
2 (#1,700,055)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Dominic Farrell
Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references