Dobzhansky and Montagu’s Debate on Race: The Aftermath

Journal of the History of Biology 49 (4):625-639 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dobzhansky and Montagu debated the use and validity of the term “race” over a period of decades. They failed to reach an agreement, and the “debate” has continued to the present. The ms contains an account of the debate to the present. This essay is part of a Special Issue, Revisiting Garland Allen’s Views on the History of the Life Sciences in the Twentieth Century.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,978

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theodosius Dobzhansky and the genetic race concept.Lisa Gannett - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (3):250-261.
Race and Reference.Adam Hochman - 2019 - Biology and Philosophy 34 (2):32.
Garland Allen, Thomas Hunt Morgan, and Development.Jane Maienschein - 2016 - Journal of the History of Biology 49 (4):587-601.
Are jews smarter than everyone else?Sander L. Gilman - 2008 - Mens Sana Monographs 6 (1):41.
What 'biological racial realism' should mean.Quayshawn Spencer - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 159 (2):181-204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
30 (#746,339)

6 months
8 (#569,389)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?