Civic Liberalism and the “Dialogical Model” of Judicial Review

Law and Philosophy 25 (5):489-531 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a world that is inherently indeterminate, a suitable theory of distributive justice must perhaps itself be indeterminate, and its indeterminacies must accommodate those of the world where relevant.Russell Hardin, Indeterminacy and Society.

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,218

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neutrality and judicial review.Frederick Schauer - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):217-240.
Judicial Review, Rights, and Democracy.Horacio Spector - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (3-4):285-334.
Weak and strong judicial review.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):381-392.
Designing judicial review: A comment on Schauer.Emily Sherwin - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):241-246.
Is judicial review democratic? A comment on Harel.Larry Alexander - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):277-283.
Patriotic liberalism.John P. Anderson - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (6):577 - 595.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-22

Downloads
5 (#1,790,273)

6 months
2 (#1,352,106)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references