Measuring fairness across cultural contexts

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):822-822 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Future economic game research should include: (1) within-culture comparisons between individuals exposed and not exposed to market integration; (2) use of a game (such as the “Sharing Game”) that enables subjects to maximize their earnings while also maximizing those of the other participant; and (3) assessment of performance in a repeated-trials format that might encourage sensitivity to the games' economic contingencies.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Radical contingency in sharing behavior and its consequences.Todd Davies - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):821-821.
Making it real: Interpreting economic experiments.Eric Alden Smith - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):832-833.
Economic games for the study of peace.Robert Böhm & Simon Columbus - 2024 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 47:e4.
The game-theoretic innocence of experimental behavioral psychology.Don Ross - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):426-427.
Distributive Justice and Empirical Moral Psychology.Christian Miller - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:Online.
Reducible and Nonsensical Uses of Game Theory.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (2):247-266.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
58 (#373,074)

6 months
17 (#179,757)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references