Other voices, other minds

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (2):213-222 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Solipsism can be refuted along fairly traditional, internalist lines, by means of a second-order induction. We are justified in believing in other minds, because other people tell us that they have minds, and we have good inductive reason to believe that whatever certain others say is likely to be true. This simple argument is sound, the author argues, even though we are in no prior position to believe that other thinking people exist as such, or that the sounds they make have any meaning. The mere phenomenal surfaces of others' statements form sufficient grounds for the induction that the argument requires

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Induction and other minds.George N. Schlesinger - 1974 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 52 (1):3-21.
Our certainty of other minds.Ray H. Dotterer - 1940 - Philosophy of Science 7 (October):442-450.
Testimony and Belief.Theodore Joseph Everett - 1996 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Induction and other minds.Michael Anthony Slote - 1966 - Review of Metaphysics 20 (2):341-60.
Three problems about other minds.W. W. Mellor - 1956 - Mind 65 (April):200-217.
The analogy of feeling.Stuart N. Hampshire - 1952 - Mind 61 (January):1-12.
Perception, Evidence, and our Expressive Knowledge of Others' Minds.Anil Gomes - 2019 - In Anita Avramides & Matthew Parrott (eds.), Knowing Other Minds. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Solipsism and the Solitary Language User.Irwin Goldstein - 2007 - Philosophical Papers 36 (1):35-47.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
377 (#75,150)

6 months
43 (#106,604)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ted Everett
State University of New York at Geneseo

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references