Horace, Carm. 2, 12, 13: domina… Licymnia

Hermes 142 (4):494-498 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An important additional argument for the thesis that Licymnia is not one of Horace’s beloved girls but probably Maecenas’ wife, is the fact that Horace in his “Carmina”, unlike the elegiac poets, never uses domina to denote one of his girls.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The persona of licymnia: A revaluation of Horace, carm. 2. 12.Gregson Davis - 1975 - Philologus: Zeitschrift für Antike Literatur Und Ihre Rezeption 119 (1-2):70-83.
Horace, Maecenas and Odes 2, 17.Emily Mcdermott - 1982 - Hermes 110 (2):211-228.
Horace and His Fathers: Satires 1.4 and 1.6.Catherine Schlegel - 2000 - American Journal of Philology 121 (1):93-119.
Horace in Love, Horace on Love.Giacomo Fedeli - 2023 - Classical Quarterly 73 (1):213-230.
Some 'Central' Thoughts on Horace's Odes.L. A. Moritz - 1968 - Classical Quarterly 18 (01):116-.
Late Horatian Lyric and the Virgilian Golden Age.Andreas T. Zanker - 2010 - American Journal of Philology 131 (3):495-516.
Sellar's Horace and the Elegiac Poets. [REVIEW]R. Y. Tyrrell - 1892 - The Classical Review 6 (5):221-223.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-23

Downloads
9 (#1,544,556)

6 months
5 (#985,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references