The Formal Distinction of Duns Scotus [Book Review]

Journal of Philosophy 45 (6):168-168 (1948)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Formal Distinction of Duns Scotus. [REVIEW]Julius R. Weinberg - 1947 - Philosophical Review 56 (4):448-449.
The formal distinction of Duns Scotus.Maurice John Grajewski - 1944 - Washington, D.C.,: The Catholic university of America press.
The Formal Distinction of Duns Scotus and its Philosophic Applications.Maurice Grajewski - 1945 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 20:145-156.
Duns Scotus. [REVIEW]Lynn Thorndike - 1928 - Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):80-83.
William of Alnwick's analysis of Scotus' ‘formal non-identity’.John H. L. van den Bercken - 2021 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 29 (3):435-452.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-19

Downloads
29 (#782,679)

6 months
8 (#610,780)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references