What's So Rickety? Richardson's Non‐Epistemic Democracy

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):204-204 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Response to Pettit, Estlund, and Christiano. [REVIEW]Henry S. Richardson - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):218-218.
Review: Response to Pettit, Estlund, and Christiano. [REVIEW]Henry S. Richardson - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):218 - 230.
What’s Character Got to Do with It? [REVIEW]Robert C. Solomon - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):648–655.
Epistemic Goals and Epistemic Values.Stephen R. Grimm - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (3):725-744.
Democracy and bureaucracy. [REVIEW]Thomas Christiano - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):211–211.
Epistemic desiderata.William P. Alston - 1993 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (3):527-551.
Disagreement: What’s the Problem? or A Good Peer is Hard to Find.Nathan L. King - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (2):249-272.
Husserl, by David Bell. [REVIEW]Richard Tieszen - 1992 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (4):1010-1013.
The Perils of Epistemic ReductionismTruth and Objectivity.Terence Horgan & Crispin Wright - 1996 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (4):891.
Epistemic Warrant as Proper Function. [REVIEW]William Alston - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (2):397-402.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
321 (#87,438)

6 months
73 (#82,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Estlund
Brown University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references