Therefore, please debate

Abstract

Debate? To do this, it is necessary to doubt oneself and to listen to the other. This is what Kant called "judgment" (see the Critique of Judgment [1]): to be able to put oneself in the position of the other. For if we do not make the effort to imagine what the other is saying, if we are not able to put ourselves in the speaker's place in order to understand exactly the basis of what he is saying and how he is saying it, how are we to consider and reason about the truth or falsity of this argument?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Kant's Copernican Theory of Self-Consciousness.Shaun David Baker - 1999 - Dissertation, Wayne State University
Knowing and Saying We Know.Jeff Johnson - 2000 - Essays in Philosophy 1 (2):4.
Anscombe on Sensations of Position.Wenqi Yin - 2020 - Journal of Human Cognition 4 (2):4-22.
Justification is not internal.John Greco - 2013 - In Matthias Steup & John Turri (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Blackwell. pp. 257--269.
The Common Point of View in Hume’s Ethics.Rachel Cohon - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):827-850.
The Universalizability of Moral Judgements.Peter Winch - 1965 - The Monist 49 (2):196-214.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-08-02

Downloads
63 (#340,948)

6 months
40 (#108,805)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references