The limits of mindreading

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (1):172-177 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contemporary cognitive psychology is dominated by an individualistic and mentalistic approach to the mind.This Cartesian heritage is evident in studies of social understanding, that is, how we understand others. It is argued that this approach and metaphors like reading minds have failed, and should be replaced with a discursive approach, where public and shared socio-linguistic intenand normative activities order and shape individual mental activities

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Signature Limits in Mindreading Systems.J. Robert Thompson - 2014 - Cognitive Science 38 (7):1432-1455.
Mind Misreading.Shannon Spaulding - 2016 - Philosophical Issues 26 (1).
Embodying the False-Belief Tasks.Michael Wilby - 2012 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11 (4):519-540.
We read minds to shape relationships.Vivian Bohl - 2015 - Philosophical Psychology 28 (5):674-694.
Understanding Others, Conceptual Know-How and Social World.Rémi Clot-Goudard - 2024 - Journal for the Philosophy of Language, Mind and the Arts 5 (3):168-184.
Minimal Mindreading and Animal Cognition.Anna Strasser - 2018 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 95 (4):541-565.
Is mindreading a gadget?Pierre Jacob & Thom Scott-Phillips - 2020 - Synthese 199 (1-2):1-27.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-02-13

Downloads
49 (#451,983)

6 months
6 (#888,477)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?