Coercing Future Freedom: Consent and Capacities for Autonomous Choice

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (4):799-806 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I examine some of the significant moral concerns inherent in cases of treatment refusal involving patients with psychotic disorders. In particular, I explore the relevance of the principle of autonomy in such situations. After exploring the concept of autonomy and explaining its current and historical significance in a health care setting, I argue that because autonomous choice depends for its existence upon certain human functions such as the ability to reason, judge, and assess consequences, patients cannot be said to be making free and autonomous decisions if these capacities are compromised. I contend further that because psychotic disorders have the potential to compromise these functions in the future, it is appropriate, in some limited cases, to coerce patients with psychotic disorders to undergo treatment in order to preserve their future decisionmaking capacities and to protect their ability to recognize and respect the autonomy of others.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-25

Downloads
75 (#285,046)

6 months
12 (#282,957)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

M. Carmela Epright
Furman University

Citations of this work

Ethical complexities in assessing patients’ insight.Laura Guidry-Grimes - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (3):178-182.

Add more citations