Interrogative Belief Revision Based on Epistemic Strategies

Studia Logica 100 (3):453-479 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I develop a dynamic logic for reasoning about "interrogative belief revision", a new branch of belief revision theory that has been developed in a small number of papers, beginning with E. J. Olsson and D. Westlund's paper "On the role of the research agenda in epistemic change" [12]. In interrogative belief revision, epistemic states are taken to include a research agenda, consisting of questions the agent seeks to answer. I present a logic for revision of such epistemic states based on the notion of an epistemic strategy, a stable plan of action that determines changes in the agent's research agenda. This idea is a further development of an idea put forward in [6], that changes in the research agenda of an agent should be determined by stable, "long term" research interests. I provide complete axioms and a decidability result for the logic

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Interrogative Belief Revision.Sebastian Enqvist - 2011 - Dissertation, Lund University
Modelling Epistemic Actions in Interrogative Belief Revision.Sebastian Enqvist - 2012 - Journal of Logic and Computation 22 (6):1335-1365.
Interrogative Belief Revision in Modal Logic.Sebastian Enqvist - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (5):527-548.
Extensive Questions.Emmanuel Genot - 2009 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5378:131--145.
The Best of All Possible Worlds.Emmanuel J. Genot - 2011 - In Erik J. Olson Sebastian Enqvist (ed.), Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science. Springer. pp. 225--252.
Revocable Belief Revision.Hans van Ditmarsch - 2013 - Studia Logica 101 (6):1185-1214.
Dynamic logic for belief revision.Johan van Benthem - 2007 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 17 (2):129-155.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-07-03

Downloads
85 (#246,360)

6 months
14 (#227,991)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Why Double-Check?Elise Woodard - 2024 - Episteme 21 (2):644-667.
Why Double-Check?Elise Woodard - 2022 - Episteme:1-24.
Should epistemology take the zetetic turn?Arianna Falbo - 2023 - Philosophical Studies 180 (10-11):2977-3002.

Add more citations