How Objectivity Matters

Oxford Studies in Metaethics 5:111-52 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

reprint Enoch, David (2010) "How Objectivity Matters". In Shafer-Landau, Russ, Oxford Studies in Metaethics: Volume 5, pp. : Oxford University Press (2010)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Partial Values: A Comparative Study in the Limits of Objectivity.Kevin Michael DeLapp - 2018 - Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Nietzsche and moral objectivity : the development of Nietzsche's metaethics.Maudemarie Clark & David Dudrick - 2007 - In Brian Leiter & Neil Sinhababu (eds.), Nietzsche and morality. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 192--226.
Archimedeanism and Why Metaethics Matters.Paul Bloomfield - 2009 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 4:283-302.
The Good and The Gross: Essays in metaethics and moral psychology.Alexandra A. Plakias - 2011 - Dissertation, University of Michigan
David Enoch, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.is General Jurisprudence Interesting? - 2019 - In Toh Kevin, Plunkett David & Shapiro Scott (eds.), Dimensions of Normativity: New Essays on Metaethics and Jurisprudence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Realism and Objectivity.Billy Dunaway - 2017 - In Tristram Colin McPherson & David Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. New York: Routledge. pp. 135-150.
Objectivity.Ross Colebrook & Hagop Sarkissian - 2018 - In Todd K. Shackelford & Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford (eds.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer Verlag.
Moral objectivity and responsibility in ethics: A socratic response to Hume's legacy in the 20th century.Owen Anderson - 2010 - Heythrop Journal 51 (2):178-191.
Sensibility and moral values in Mengzi’s metaethics.Meng Zhang - 2022 - Asian Philosophy 32 (3):312-330.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-15

Downloads
259 (#103,390)

6 months
259 (#9,587)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Enoch
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Citations of this work

Why There Really Are No Irreducibly Normative Properties.Bart Streumer - 2013 - In David Bakhurst, Margaret Olivia Little & Brad Hooker (eds.), Thinking about reasons: themes from the philosophy of Jonathan Dancy. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 310-336.
Constructivism in Ethics.Carla Bagnoli (ed.) - 2013 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references