Correction to: Thanks, We’re good: why moral realism is not morally objectionable

Philosophical Studies 178 (7):2357-2357 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the original publication of the article, some of the references were published incorrectly. The corrected references are provided below

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2021

DOI

10.1007/s11098-020-01537-5

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Erratum to: Intuition and Its Object.Kai Hauser - 2015 - Axiomathes 25 (3):283-284.
Correction to: Credal pragmatism.Jie Gao - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (6):1619-1619.
Correction to: The semantic plights of the ante-rem structuralist.Bahram Assadian - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (12):3237-3237.
Correction to: Possessing epistemic reasons: the role of rational capacities.Eva Schmidt - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (2):503-503.
Correction to: Towards an integral perspective on leveraging sustainability transformations using the theory of modal aspects.S. Wigboldus & H. Jochemsen - 2021 - Sustainability Science 16 (3):933-935.
Thanks, We’re good: why moral realism is not morally objectionable.David Enoch - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (5):1689-1699.
Correction to: Scientific supremacy as an obstacle to establishing and sustaining interdisciplinary dialogue across knowledge paradigms in health and medicine.Birgitta Haga Gripsrud & Kari Nyheim Solbrække - 2019 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (4):639-639.
Correction to: Should Animalists Be “Transplanimalists”?Jeremy W. Skrzypek & Dominic Mangino - 2021 - Axiomathes 31 (1):125-125.
Correction to: Informing materials: drugs as tools for exploring cancer mechanisms and pathways.Etienne Vignola-Gagné, Peter Keating & Alberto Cambrosio - 2017 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 40 (1):12.
Correction to: Holobionts and the ecology of organisms: Multi-species communities or integrated individuals?Derek Skillings - 2018 - Biology and Philosophy 33 (3-4):28.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-13

Downloads
64 (#334,329)

6 months
10 (#430,153)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Enoch
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Defense of Moral Deference.David Enoch - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy 111 (5):229-258.
How Principles Ground.David Enoch - 2019 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 14:1-22.

Add more references