Positivism and normative inference: Two key legal problems of late modernity

Abstract

Two false dichotomies, "no is from ought" and "either natural law or positivism" impair current legal thought. This article exposes those dichotomies and explains why they are not in fact accurate using Professor Duncan Kennedy's work as a foil for the exposition.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Socio-Legal Positivism and a General Jurisprudence.Brian Z. Tamanaha - 2001 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21 (1):1-32.
Law as a moral judgment.Deryck Beyleveld - 1986 - London: Sweet & Maxwell. Edited by Roger Brownsword.
The Problem of Morality in Soft and Hard Legal Positivism.Ataollah Salehi & Mahdi Balavi - 2023 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations 17 (44):488-506.
Jurisprudence.Albert Keating - 2011 - Dublin: Round Hall.
The Cambridge Companion to Legal Positivism.Torben Spaak (ed.) - 2021 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
How Practices Make Principles and How Principles Make Rules.Mitchell Berman - 2024 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 28 (3).

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
17 (#1,158,190)

6 months
2 (#1,690,857)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references