- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Measures of Freedom of Choice
Dissertation, Uppsala University (2012)
Abstract
The thesis studies the problem of measuring freedom of choice. It analyzes the concept of freedom of choice, discusses conditions that a measure should satisfy, and introduces a new class of measures that uniquely satisfy ten proposed conditions.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review of Karin Enflo, Measures of Freedom of Choice. [REVIEW]Johan E. Gustafsson - 2015 - Theoria 81 (1):87-92.
Measuring Opportunity.Karin Enflo - 2011 - In Rysiek Sliwinski & Frans Svensson, Neither/Nor. Uppsala university. pp. 53-68.
Constraints and the Measurement of Freedom of Choice.Sebastiano Bavetta & Marco Del Seta - 2001 - Theory and Decision 50 (3):213-238.
A Paradox for the Intrinsic Value of Freedom of Choice.Johan E. Gustafsson - 2019 - Noûs 54 (4):891-913.
Freedom of Choice and Expected Compromise.Johan E. Gustafsson - 2010 - Social Choice and Welfare 35 (1):65-79.
Foundation or Individual in a Determinate Universe.Vitaly V. Tsuckerman - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 15:53-55.
The representation of freedom in decisions: Good outcomes or real choice?Stephan Lau & Sophia Walter - 2020 - Philosophical Psychology 33 (4):592-623.
C. A. Campbell's Effort of Will Argument.Phillip D. Gosselin - 1977 - Religious Studies 13 (4):429 - 438.
Reproductive choice : Men's freedom and women's responsibility?Sally Sheldon - 2006 - In John R. Spencer & Antje Du Bois-Pedain, Freedom and responsibility in reproductive choice. Portland, Or.: Hart.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-08-26
Downloads
87 (#252,217)
6 months
14 (#201,053)
2015-08-26
Downloads
87 (#252,217)
6 months
14 (#201,053)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
How Nationalistic Appeals Affect Foreign Luxury Brand Reputation: A Study of Ambivalent Effects.Boris Bartikowski, Fernando Fastoso & Heribert Gierl - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 169 (2):261-277.
References found in this work
Basic Measurement Theory.Patrick Suppes & Joseph Zinnes - 1963 - In D. Luce, Handbook of Mathematical Psychology. John Wiley & Sons.. pp. 1-76.
The Significance of Choice.T. M. Scanlon - 1988 - In Sterling M. McMurrin, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Vol. 8, pp. 149-216). University of Utah Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-xhc6d uwo