- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Research Ethics Committees: The Business of Society and Medicine
Research Ethics 5 (4):154-156 (2009)
Abstract
Whilst Colin Parker and I are in broad disagreement we would nevertheless agree that RECs have both political and ethical functions, albeit to differing degrees, and that a proper account of ethical expertise needs to be given. The uses RECs make of ethical experts and expertise and the way in which this might be recognised remains, from my perspective, open for debate. My only conclusion is that it should be recognised.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Business of Medicine: A Response to Nathan Emmerich.Colin Parker - 2009 - Research Ethics 5 (4):151-153.
Ethics and Health Care: The Role of Research Ethics Committees in the United Kingdom.Julia Neuberger - 1992
Elective Modernism and the Politics of Ethical Expertise.Nathan Emmerich - 2018 - In Hauke Riesch, Nathan Emmerich & Steven Wainwright (eds.), Philosophies and Sociologies of Bioethics: Crossing the Divides. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 23-40.
Helping Research Ethics Committees Share Their Experience, Learn from Review and Develop Consensus: An Observational Study of the UK Shared Ethical Debate.Peter Heasman, Alain Gregoire & Hugh Davies - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (1):13-18.
Elective Modernism and the Politics of (Bio) Ethical Expertise.Nathan Emmerich - 2018 - In Hauke Riesch, Nathan Emmerich & Steven Wainwright (eds.), Philosophies and Sociologies of Bioethics: Crossing the Divides. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 23-40.
The Multiplicity of Bioethical Expertise in the Context of Secular Liberal Democracies.Nathan Emmerich - forthcoming - Society.
Response to Schrag: What are ethics committees for anyway? A defence of social science research ethics review.Sean Jennings - 2012 - Research Ethics 8 (2):87-96.
Ethical governance in Chinese universities: an overview of research ethics committees.Dan Li - 2025 - Ethics and Behavior 35 (1):1-12.
Is Ethical Expertise Possible?Jukka Varelius - 2008 - Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 11 (2):127-132.
The epistemology and ethics of consensus: Uses and misuses of 'ethical' expertise.Rosemarie Tong - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):409-426.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-21
Downloads
15 (#1,233,030)
6 months
7 (#706,906)
2014-01-21
Downloads
15 (#1,233,030)
6 months
7 (#706,906)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
References found in this work
Strangers at the Bedside: A History of How Law and Bioethics Transformed Medical Decision Making.David J. Rothman - 2003 - New York: Aldinetransaction.
John Gregory and the Invention of Professional Medical Ethics and the Profession of Medicine.Laurence B. McCullough - 1998 - Springer Verlag.
Ethical Engineers Need Not Apply: The State of Applied Ethics Today.Arthur L. Caplan - 1980 - Science, Technology and Human Values 5 (4):24-32.
On the Ethics Committee: The Expert Member, the Lay Member and the Absentee Ethicist.Nathan Emmerich - 2009 - Research Ethics 5 (1):9-13.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-q5wnn uwo