Formal Causes: Definition, Explanation, and Primacy in Socratic and Aristotelian Thought by Michael T. Ferejohn

Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (4):672-673 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ferejohn’s clear and elegant book makes a strong case for a developmentalist reading of Aristotle’s views about the nature of philosophical understanding. It is a pleasurable read and engages with several issues central to Socratic and Aristotelian scholarship. Formal Causes will be an important resource for anyone thinking about Aristotle’s philosophical method and the relationships between his thought and that of his predecessors.Ferejohn’s general picture of Aristotle’s philosophical development is familiar, if also somewhat controversial. In the works comprising the Organon, Aristotle’s thinking occurs largely within the confines he inherits from the Academy. He emphasizes the importance of formal causes in...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aristotle's de Anima in Focus.Michael Durrant (ed.) - 1993 - New York: Routledge.
Aristotle's Science of Matter and Motion by Christopher Byrne.Mary Krizan - 2020 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 58 (2):399-400.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-05

Downloads
18 (#1,123,254)

6 months
6 (#891,985)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Keith E. McPartland
Williams College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references