Abstract

Chauchard has given a neurophysiological transcription of the evolutionary thought of Teilhard, which should give his critics, scientific, philosophical, and theological, reason to pause and reassess the place of his thought in all of these areas. Teilhard was basically a scientist, according to Chauchard. He attempts to show that scientific phenomenology, which allows its categories to be shaped by the dynamic in addition to the formal, mathematical structure of its subject matter, is just as legitimately a scientific method as what has passed as such for so long. In particular, scientific phenomenology allows the neuro-physiologist to speak of subjectivity in an appropriately scientific way that cuts away the false dichotomy between the "subjective" and "objective," which invariably invites the reduction of either one to the other, or leaves them side by side in an incommunicable dualism.—E. A. R.