- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Patients Doubtfully Capable or Incapable of Consent
In Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer (eds.), A Companion to Bioethics. Malden, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 541–550 (1998)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: The Standard Models of Decision‐making Capacity and Surrogate Decision‐making References Further reading.
patients doubtfully capable or incapable of consent concept of autonomy ‐ role in development of bioethics incompetent and marginally competent patients ethical problems associated with pediatrics problems surrounding aggressive or life‐sustaining medical treatment and incompetent adults standard models of decision‐making capacity and surrogate decision‐making problem of competent irrationality problems of personal identity and moral imagination problem of asymmetrical relationships problem of meaning and the profoundly damaged child
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
“What the patient would have decided”: A fundamental problem with the substituted judgment standard. [REVIEW]Linus Broström, Mats Johansson & Morten Klemme Nielsen - 2006 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (3):265-278.
Making decisions about life-sustaining medical treatment in patients with dementia.Arthur R. Derse - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1):55-67.
Three Kinds of Decision-Making Capacity for Refusing Medical Interventions.Mark Christopher Navin, Abram L. Brummett & Jason Adam Wasserman - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (11):73-83.
Deciding for the Incompetent.Eric Vogelstein - 2016 - In John K. Davis (ed.), Ethics at the End of Life: New Issues and Arguments. New York: Routledge. pp. 108-125.
Patient autonomy, assessment of competence and surrogate decision-making: A call for reasonableness in deciding for others.Kristine Baerøe - 2008 - Bioethics 24 (2):87-95.
Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making.Allen E. Buchanan & Dan W. Brock - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Dan W. Brock.
Patient Autonomy, Assessment of Competence and Surrogate Decision‐Making: A Call for Reasonableness in Deciding for Others.Kristine Bærøe - 2008 - Bioethics 24 (2):87-95.
Medical Decisions at the End of Life.Dan W. Brock - 1998 - In Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer (eds.), A Companion to Bioethics. Malden, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 261–273.
Counterfactual reasoning in surrogate decision making – another look.Mats Johansson & Linus Broström - 2009 - Bioethics 25 (5):244-249.
Turning failures into successes: A methodological shortcoming in empirical research on surrogate accuracy.Mats Johansson & Linus Broström - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):17-26.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-15
Downloads
12 (#1,367,507)
6 months
9 (#480,483)
2023-06-15
Downloads
12 (#1,367,507)
6 months
9 (#480,483)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-q5wnn uwo