On bishop sentences

Natural Language Semantics 18 (1):65-78 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article offers a critical examination of Kroll’s (Natural Language Semantics 16: 359–372, 2008) arguments against Elbourne’s (Situations and individuals, 2005) treatment of bishop sentences

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11050-009-9051-9

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Real Problem of Bishop Sentences.Hsiang-Yun Chen - 2017 - NTU Philosophical Review 54 (4):129-162.
Incomplete descriptions and indistinguishable participants.Paul Elbourne - 2016 - Natural Language Semantics 24 (1):1-43.
On Bishops and Donkeys.Nicky Kroll - 2008 - Natural Language Semantics 16 (4):359-372.
Situations and Individuals.Paul D. Elbourne - 2005 - MIT Press.
When the donkey lost its fleas: persistence, minimal situations, and embedded quantifiers. [REVIEW]Eytan Zweig - 2006 - Natural Language Semantics 14 (4):283-296.
Crossover Situations.Daniel Büring - 2004 - Natural Language Semantics 12 (1):23-62.
Predicate logic with flexibly binding operators and natural language semantics.Peter Pagin & Dag Westerståhl - 1993 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 2 (2):89-128.
E-Type Anaphora as NP-Deletion.Paul Elbourne - 2001 - Natural Language Semantics 9 (3):241-288.
Counterfactual Donkey Sentences: A Response to Robert van Rooij: Articles.Yingying Wang - 2009 - Journal of Semantics 26 (3):317-328.
E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora.Irene Heim - 1990 - Linguistics and Philosophy 13 (2):137--77.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
55 (#409,745)

6 months
1 (#1,572,794)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Elbourne
Oxford University

Citations of this work

Stoic logic and multiple generality.Susanne Bobzien & Simon Shogry - 2020 - Philosophers' Imprint 20 (31):1-36.
Descriptions.Peter Ludlow - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Donkey anaphora: the view from sign language (ASL and LSF).Philippe Schlenker - 2011 - Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (4):341-395.
Incomplete descriptions and indistinguishable participants.Paul Elbourne - 2016 - Natural Language Semantics 24 (1):1-43.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Semantics in generative grammar.Irene Heim & Angelika Kratzer - 1998 - Malden, MA: Blackwell. Edited by Angelika Kratzer.
Literal Meaning.François Récanati - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reference and generality.P. T. Geach - 1962 - Ithaca, N.Y.,: Cornell University Press. Edited by Michael C. Rea.
Descriptions.Stephen Neale - 1990 - MIT Press.

View all 19 references / Add more references