Abstract

Laurence Cooper has offered a wellwritten, carefully argued, thought-provoking account of Rousseaus understanding of the primitive basis for the natural goodness of civil man and the relation between amour de soi and amour-propre. His book exposes a troubling perplexity in Rousseaus work. One might find Rousseaus account of the goodness of the primitive human beings to be a model for psychic unity in all healthy and natural civilized men. But, one could also understand Rousseaus Second Discourse as a thought experiment that shows that distinctively human traits are, in fact, social in origin. Laurence Cooper wants to have it both ways. While self-consciousness is a necessary part of the human condition as we know it, Cooper maintains Rousseaus own ambiguity regarding the humanity of the less than fully human savage man. Unproblematic solitary self-love, amour de soi, defines natural man. Amour-propre, comparative self-preference, develops with sociability and introduces all conflict and corruption. Laurence Cooper examines its potential benefit when redirected into healthy pride or reciprocal affection.