Fiction and Content in Hume’s Labyrinth

Philosophical Quarterly 74 (1):187-207 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the “Appendix” to the Treatise, Hume claims that he has discovered a “very considerable” mistake in his earlier discussion of the self. Hume's expression of the problem is notoriously opaque, leading to a vast scholarly debate as to exactly what problem he identified in his earlier account of the self. I propose a new solution to this interpretive puzzle. I argue that a tension generated by Hume's conceptual skepticism about real “principles of union” and his account of fictions of the imagination is the defect identified in the “Appendix.”

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-15

Downloads
209 (#119,714)

6 months
18 (#155,830)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bridger Ehli
Indiana University, Bloomington

Citations of this work

Hume and the fiction of the self.Matthew Parrott - 2024 - European Journal of Philosophy 32 (4):1049-1067.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Treatise of Human Nature.David Hume & A. D. Lindsay - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (33):379-380.
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.John Locke - 1979 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 169 (2):221-222.
Cognition and Commitment in Hume’s Philosophy.Don Garrett - 1997 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 62 (1):191-196.

View all 51 references / Add more references