Hypothetical Consent in Kantian Constructivism

Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (2):300-329 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Epistemology, as I understand it, is a branch of philosophy especially concerned with general questions about how we can know various things or at least justify our beliefs about them. It questions what counts as evidence and what are reasonable sources of doubt. Traditionally, episte-mology focuses on pervasive and apparently basic assumptions covering a wide range of claims to knowledge or justified belief rather than very specific, practical puzzles. For example, traditional epistemologists ask “How do we know there are material objects?” and not “How do you know which are the female beetles?” Similarly,moralepistemology, as I understand it, is concerned with general questions about how we can know or justify our beliefs about moral matters. Its focus, again, is on quite general, pervasive, and apparently basic assumptions about what counts as evidence, what are reasonable sources of doubt, and what are the appropriate procedures for justifying particular moral claims.

Other Versions

edition Hill, Thomas E. (2002) "Hypothetical Consent in Kantian Constructivism". In E. Hill, Thomas, Human Welfare and Moral Worth: Kantian Perspectives, pp. : Clarendon Press (2002)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Understanding Voice, Self, and Mind - Notes from the Editor.Richard Morehouse & Sheri Bauer - 1987 - Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 8 (1).
Epistemology: Critical Concepts in Philosophy.Ram Neta (ed.) - 2012 - New York: Routledge.
Epistemology.Matthias Steup - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Procedural Epistemology — At the Interface of Philosophy and AI.John L. Pollock - 1999 - In John Greco & Ernest Sosa, The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 383–414.
Reasons for Belief.Andrew Reisner & Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (eds.) - 2011 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Inferential practical knowledge of meaning.Brendan Balcerak Jackson - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
166 (#144,694)

6 months
7 (#469,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Constructivism in metaethics.Carla Bagnoli - 2017 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Constructivism in metaethics.Carla Bagnoli - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Aristotelian constructivism.Mark LeBar - 2008 - Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (1):182-213.
The limits of moral constructivism.Mark Timmons - 2003 - Ratio 16 (4):391–423.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon (ed.) - 1998 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Kantian constructivism in moral theory.John Rawls - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (9):515-572.

View all 14 references / Add more references