Computational models: a modest role for content

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (3):253-259 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The computational theory of mind construes the mind as an information-processor and cognitive capacities as essentially representational capacities. Proponents of the view claim a central role for representational content in computational models of these capacities. In this paper I argue that the standard view of the role of representational content in computational models is mistaken; I argue that representational content is to be understood as a gloss on the computational characterization of a cognitive process.Keywords: Computation; Representational content; Cognitive capacities; Explanation

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
175 (#139,625)

6 months
7 (#469,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frances Egan
Rutgers - New Brunswick

Citations of this work

How to think about mental content.Frances Egan - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (1):115-135.
Data models, representation and adequacy-for-purpose.Alisa Bokulich & Wendy Parker - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (1):1-26.
Representation in Cognitive Science: Replies.Nicholas Shea - 2020 - Mind and Language 35 (3):402-412.

View all 42 citations / Add more citations