- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Why Bourdieu? Five responses to Toril Moi’s question
Abstract
This paper presents five responses to Toril Moi’s question of why study Pierre Bourdieu, dividing them into responses which suppose that Bourdieu’s originality is negligible and responses which do not.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
A Review of Toril Moi’s Simone de Beauvoir: the Making of an Intellectual Woman. [REVIEW]Åsa Moberg - 1994 - Simone de Beauvoir Studies 11 (1):141-142.
How to avoid begging the question against evolutionary debunking arguments.David Copp - 2019 - Ratio 32 (4):231-245.
On the embodied meaning of emotional responses to music: A semiotic perspective.Robert M. Cantor - 2019 - Semiotica 2019 (231):225-244.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-03-31
Downloads
290 (#94,267)
6 months
78 (#78,878)
2022-03-31
Downloads
290 (#94,267)
6 months
78 (#78,878)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-6qn2c uwo