Judith Jarvis Thomson on the analysis of causation, and another entailment objection

Abstract

In a book contribution responding to H.L.A. Hart and Tony Honoré, Judith Jarvis Thomson casts a certain analysis of causation in an attractive light, but says that it unfortunately faces two objections. I draw attention to another objection.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Judith Jarvis Thomson.Marco A. Azevedo - 2020 - Filosofia Unisinos 21 (3):315-316.
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1929-2020).Marco A. Azevedo - 2020 - Filosofia Unisinos 21 (3).
Innocent Burdens.James Edwin Mahon - 2014 - Washington and Lee Law Review 71.
Comment (on Judith Jarvis Thomson).Barbara Herrnstein Smith - 2009 - In Judith JarvisHG Thomson (ed.), Goodness and Advice. Princeton University Press. pp. 132-144.
A Defence of Abortion; A Question for Judith Jarvis Thomson.Philip W. Bennett - 1982 - Philosophical Investigations 5 (2):142-145.
Preferential hiring: A reply to Judith Jarvis Thomson.Robert Simon - 1974 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 3 (3):312-320.
The Responsibility Objection to Thomson Re-imagined: What If Men Were Held to a Parallel Standard?Vicki Toscano - 2023 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 16 (2):26-45.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-06

Downloads
286 (#95,411)

6 months
65 (#89,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references