Incentives to scan complex wholes?

Abstract

Robert Nozick declares that scanning complex wholes is not easy. Presumably few people exhibited the skill before Nozick, but I propose another explanation for why few people exhibit it than difficulty. Focusing specifically on scanning for inconsistencies, papers conveying them won’t look impressive to certain evaluators.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Feser on Nozick. [REVIEW]Peter Jaworski - 2005 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 7 (1):181-187.
Nozick's defense of closure.Peter Baumann - 2012 - In Kelly Becker & Tim Black (eds.), The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 11--27.
Nozick's Revenge.Nigel Walker - 1995 - Philosophy 70 (274):581 - 586.
The Bounds of Sense and the Limits of Analysis.Paul Guyer - 2017 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (3):365-382.
Nozick on free will.Michael Bratman - 2002 - In David Schmidtz (ed.), Robert Nozick. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 155--174.
Simple wholes and complex parts: Limiting principles in Spinoza.William Sacksteder - 1985 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (3):393-406.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-10

Downloads
189 (#129,287)

6 months
46 (#104,506)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references