- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
When nonreliability of reviews indicates solid science
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):145-146 (1991)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The myth of kinesthetic aftereffect's nonreliability.Brian L. Mishara - 1986 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9 (4):747-748.
Toward a unified behavioral and brain science.Jerome A. Feldman - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (3):458-458.
Administrative freedom versus academic freedom and peer reviews.Russell L. Berry - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):743-744.
The where in the brain determines the when in the mind.M. Jeannerod - 1992 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (2):212-213.
Can phenomenology contribute to brain science?Gordon G. Globus - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (3):430-431.
When the predictive brain gets it really wrong.Gavin Buckingham & Melvyn A. Goodale - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):208-209.
Understanding the physical attractiveness literature: Qualitative reviews versus meta-analysis.Alan Feingold - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
When is a reflex not a reflex? The riddle of behavioral-state control.J. A. Hobson, R. Lydic & H. A. Baghdoyan - 1986 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9 (3):426-448.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
24 (#914,270)
6 months
5 (#1,053,842)
2014-01-20
Downloads
24 (#914,270)
6 months
5 (#1,053,842)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: “It's like déjà vu all over again!”.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):401-403.
Peer review reliability: The hierarchy of the sciences.Charles Crothers - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):398-399.
Reliability is neither to be expected nor desired in peer review.R. Duncan Luce - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):399-400.
References found in this work
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.) - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.Richard E. Nisbett & Lee Ross - 1980 - Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall.
Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations.Robert King Merton - 1973 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Norman W. Storer.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-72rpk uwo