Plea Bargaining and the Administration of Criminal Justice in Nigeria: A Moral Critique

IAFOR Journal of Ethics, Religion and Philosophy 3 (2):35–47 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The idea of “justice” normatively reflects “justitia” in the Roman worldview: “fiat justitia, ruat caelum” (may there be justice though the heavens fall). That is, justice must prevail no matter whose ox is gored. In its corrective schema, justice is connected to the ideas of just desert. Justice in this sense is possible through a just law couched within the principle of retributivism (where punishment is proportionate to the severity of crime). This idea must remain intact if criminal justice, as a form of social control, is to attain the moral and political legitimacy to which it aspires. Unfortunately, these ideals are constantly at risk in Nigeria’s criminal justice system, especially in the prosecution of corrupt crimes where convictions have largely been plea bargained. Plea bargaining exploits the insubstantiality of Nigeria’s criminal codes and its proponents argue from a cost-benefit analysis stance that pits cost against justice. This prima facie approach inexorably leads to the following questions: what are the requirements of justice? Is criminal justice concerned with justice to the offender or victims of crime? Is a court ruling necessarily just? The paper attempts to answer these questions in showing that justice transcends mere court rulings and is underpinned by certain moral ideals: a moral operating principle of the judicial process and the degree to which a people or victims of crime perceive their penal system as just. The current application of plea bargaining in Nigeria fails to satisfy these moral requirements of justice.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Retributivism and Plea Bargaining.Richard L. Lippke - 2006 - Criminal Justice Ethics 25 (2):3-16.
How Is Criminal Justice Related to the Rest of Justice?Jonathan Jacobs - 2020 - Criminal Justice Ethics 39 (2):111-136.
Corrective Justice as A Principle of Criminal Law: A Prolegomenon.Andrei Poama - 2018 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (4):605-623.
Ethics in the criminal justice system.Scott Howard Belshaw - 2015 - Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt publishing company. Edited by Peter Johnstone.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-07

Downloads
18 (#1,157,809)

6 months
3 (#1,061,821)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references