- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Epistemology without concepts?: Penelope Maddy: What do philosophers do? Skepticism and the practice of philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, xi+248pp, $29.95 HB [Book Review]
Metascience 27 (1):117-121 (2018)
Abstract
Review of Penelope Maddy, What Do Philosophers Do? Skepticism and the Practice of Philosophy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017, 248 pp.)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review of What do Philosophers Do? Skepticism and the Practice of Philosophy by Penelope Maddy. [REVIEW]Jan Arreman - 2018 - Philosophy in Review 38 (1):22-24.
What do Philosophers do? Skepticism and the Practice of Philosophy.Xingming Hu - 2018 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (273):862-864.
Review of, What Do Philosophers Do? Skepticism and the Practice of Philosophy, by Penelope Maddy. [REVIEW]Alexander Jackson - 2017 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 12:02.
Penelope Maddy: What Do Philosophers Do? Skepticism and the Practice of Philosophy.Timothy Williamson - 2017 - Journal of Philosophy 114 (9):492-497.
Review of What do Philosophers do? Skepticism and the Practice of Philosophy BY Maddy Penelope. [REVIEW]Xingming Hu - forthcoming - Philosophical Quarterly.
What do Philosophers do? Scepticism and the Practice of Philosophy, by Penelope Maddy. [REVIEW]Brian Weatherson - 2019 - Mind 128 (509):269-271.
What Do Philosophers Do? Maddy, Moore and Wittgenstein.Annalisa Coliva - 2018 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 8 (3):198-207.
MADDY, PENELOPE. Defending the Axioms, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011, 150 pp. [REVIEW]Rubén Herce - 2012 - Anuario Filosófico 45 (3):685-687.
Wittgenstein and Logic Today: The Logical Must by Penelope Maddy. [REVIEW]Oskari Kuusela - 2015 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 4 (1):233-236.
Penelope Maddy, Realism in mathematics. Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York1990, ix + 204 pp. [REVIEW]Bob Hale - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (2):750-752.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-10-10
Downloads
413 (#73,021)
6 months
55 (#98,911)
2017-10-10
Downloads
413 (#73,021)
6 months
55 (#98,911)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Las paradojas escépticas.Santiago Echeverri - forthcoming - In Juan Carlos Villacrés & Estefanía C. Apolo, Introducción a la Filosofía Analítica. Universidad Central del Ecuador, Fundación Filosófica.
References found in this work
The significance of philosophical scepticism.Barry Stroud - 1984 - New York: Oxford University Press.
I.—A Plea for Excuses: The Presidential Address.John Austin - 1957 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57 (1):1-30.
The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism.John Heil - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):331-336.
Logic and conversation.Herbert Paul Grice - 1989 - In Studies in the way of words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 41-58.
The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism.Roger Squires - 1986 - Philosophical Quarterly 36 (145):558-560.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-gv576 uwo